<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Short and Sour–Politics &amp; Fear Trump Evidence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skeptvet.com/Blog/2009/12/short-and-sour-politics-fear-trump-evidence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skeptvet.com/Blog/2009/12/short-and-sour-politics-fear-trump-evidence/</link>
	<description>A Vet Takes a Science-Based Look at Complementary and Alternative Medicine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:51:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bartimaeus</title>
		<link>http://skeptvet.com/Blog/2009/12/short-and-sour-politics-fear-trump-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Bartimaeus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 22:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skeptvet.com/Blog/?p=281#comment-338</guid>
		<description>I was struck by how many of the comments on the USPSTF guidelines that I heard on the radio and TV news and locally followed the form of &quot;my family has a high incidence of breast cancer and these guidelines are a death sentence!&quot;. Despite the fact that the guidelines specifically said they were for people with average or low risk, not those with higher risks.

Some of that was probably political fear-mongering, but others seemed to be people&#039;s honest feelings about the guidelines, even though they were a gross misinterpretation. Unfortunately the complexity and nuance of these things are very difficult to communicate to many people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was struck by how many of the comments on the USPSTF guidelines that I heard on the radio and TV news and locally followed the form of &#8220;my family has a high incidence of breast cancer and these guidelines are a death sentence!&#8221;. Despite the fact that the guidelines specifically said they were for people with average or low risk, not those with higher risks.</p>
<p>Some of that was probably political fear-mongering, but others seemed to be people&#8217;s honest feelings about the guidelines, even though they were a gross misinterpretation. Unfortunately the complexity and nuance of these things are very difficult to communicate to many people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

