I reviewed the evidence for Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) recently after a series of conversations on a popular veterinary discussion forum (Veterinary Information Network: VIN) in which quite strong claims were put forward about the potential value of this therapy for pets. While HBOT is a plausible therapy for which there is some good evidence of benefit in specific situations, there are unfortunately many people promoting and selling this treatment with claims that go well beyond anything supported by real scientific evidence.
Such promotion has apparently become sufficiently extensive that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has come out with a new consumer warning emphasizing that HBOT is not approved or proven effective for most of the conditions for which it is advertized. This warning includes a specific, though not complete list of conditions for which HBOT has not been scientifically proven effective nor approved by the FDA. Several of these conditions were presented in the VIN discussions as being approved by the FDA, so I thought it would be useful to post the FDA statement here for clarification.
No, hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has not been clinically proven to cure or be effective in the treatment of cancer, autism, or diabetes. But do a quick search on the Internet, and you’ll see all kinds of claims for these and other diseases for which the device has not been cleared or approved by FDA.
HBOT involves breathing oxygen in a pressurized chamber. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has cleared hyperbaric chambers for certain medical uses, such as treating decompression sickness suffered by divers.
HBOT has not, however, been proven to be the kind of universal treatment it has been touted to be on some Internet sites. FDA is concerned that some claims made by treatment centers using HBOT may give consumers a wrong impression that could ultimately endanger their health.
“Patients may incorrectly believe that these devices have been proven safe and effective for uses not cleared by FDA, which may cause them to delay or forgo proven medical therapies,” says Nayan Patel, a biomedical engineer in FDA’s Anesthesiology Devices Branch. “In doing so, they may experience a lack of improvement and/or worsening of their existing condition(s).”
Patients may be unaware that the safety and effectiveness of HBOT has not been established for these diseases and conditions, including:
- AIDS/HIV
- Alzheimer’s Disease
- Asthma
- Bell’s Palsy
- Brain Injury
- Cerebral Palsy
- Depression
- Heart Disease
- Hepatitis
- Migraine
- Multiple Sclerosis
- Parkinson’s Disease
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Sport’s Injury
- Stroke
Patel says that FDA has received 27 complaints from consumers and health care professionals over the past three years about treatment centers promoting the hyperbaric chamber for uses not cleared by the agency.
How HBOT Works
HBOT involves breathing oxygen in a pressurized chamber in which the atmospheric pressure is raised up to three times higher than normal. Under these conditions, your lungs can gather up to three times more oxygen than would be possible breathing oxygen at normal air pressure.
Patel explains that your body’s tissues need an adequate supply of oxygen to function. When tissue is injured, it may require more oxygen to heal. “Hyperbaric oxygen therapy increases the amount of oxygen dissolved in your blood,” says Patel. An increase in blood oxygen may improve oxygen delivery for vital tissue function to help fight infection or minimize injury.
Hyperbaric chambers are medical devices that require FDA clearance. FDA clearance of a device for a specific use means FDA has reviewed valid scientific evidence supporting that use and determined that the device is at least as safe and effective as another legally U.S.-marketed device.
Thirteen uses of a hyperbaric chamber for HBOT have been cleared by FDA. They include treatment of air or gas embolism (dangerous “bubbles” in the bloodstream that obstruct circulation), carbon monoxide poisoning, decompression sickness (often known by divers as “the bends”), and thermal burns (caused by heat or fire).
Thanks for this, skeptvet, and very timely!
Although, nothing on the FDA-CVM pages. How could we go about getting them to include there as well? Does it have to involve complaints from consumers and veterinary health care professionals?
The FDA-CVM would then have some explaining to do. Animals and humans are dying in these pet chambers and the FDA has not approved them for treating anything in dogs cats and horses.
Art
The CVM is slow to respond, in my experience. Complaints I have filed get answered perhaps half the time, and I have yet to see any action taken. I would guess that the more complaints they get, the more likely the agency is to respond.
Well, darn, guess I better get a complaint sent off then 🙂