Evidence Update: The Latest on Pheromones for Behavior Problems in Dogs and Cats

I have been following the research literature investigating the use of pheromones to manage behavior problems in dogs and cats since my first post of the subject in 2010. Here is a rough timeline of my conclusions over that period:

2010- Pheromone Therapy for Dogs and Cats: What’s the Evidence?
The limitations in the quality of the evidence mean we cannot definitively declare that pheromone therapy doesn’t work. What we can say is that based on the best evidence to date, it does not appear to have a benefit. Further study is certainly reasonable, but as always I question the wisdom and the ethics of widespread sale and use of products which, despite years of testing, don’t seem to have much evidence that they work.

2010- Does the Pheromone DAP Reduce Stress in Dogs Having Surgery?
“It is possible that purified or synthetic pheromones may ultimately have a role to play in treating behavioral problems in dogs and cats, or in otherwise ameliorating the stresses associated with illness and medical care. But the products currently on the market, and widely used, have so far not done a very impressive job of proving their value. Harmless? Probably. But also perfect candidate for placebo-by-proxy effects, making owners and veterinarians feel better rather than our patients.”

2016-Evidence Update: Pheromone Therapy for Stress in Cats
“The results were pretty clear. While the clinic environment is generally more stressful than the home (reflected in differences in heart rate and respiratory rate), cats tolerate being handled and restrained in an unfamiliar environment better than in their own home (reflected in behavioral differences). In neither environment did the pheromone make any difference in the cats’ responses compared with placebo. The authors concluded that the pheromone had no influence on the markers of stress evaluated in this study.

Given the consistency of results across a number of studies, it is pretty clear at this point that pheromone products are unlikely to have any beneficial effects for dogs and cats.”

2017- Evidence Update: Feline Facial Pheromone Doesn’t Reduce Stress or URIs in Shelter Cat Study
“The findings, however, were pretty consistently negative. No difference was seen in stress scores or in the occurrence of URI between cats exposed to the pheromone and those exposed to the placebo. No evidence of harm from the pheromone treatment was seen, though this was not specifically sought.

As usual, no single study should be taken as the definitive answer to any medical question. However, in light of the fact that pheromones have been in use and studied extensively for decades and strong, consistent evidence of significant benefits has not been seen, this study strengthens the argument that these products do not, in fact, provide such benefits.”

2018-Pheromone’s Therapeutic Use in Animals
“It is clear that pheromones play an important role in the regulation of mammalian behavior, so it is plausible that they might have therapeutic value in managing problematic or pathologic behaviors. However, there is little published preclinical evidence on the composition or effects of natural pheromones or synthetic analogues, and what is available comes from proprietary or commercial sources.

Results of clinical studies of these products are mixed. Consistent, replicable evidence of clinically significant effects is not available. No evidence of any harm from pheromone products has been published, and while adverse events seem unlikely, no study has been conducted specifically to look for them.

Available pheromone products are likely safe, but it is unclear what, if any, clinical benefits they may provide for any of the variety of indications for which they are commonly recommended.”

All in all, the evidence for clinical use of pheromones in dogs and cats has not strengthened significantly in the last decade. A new study has been published which purports to support one benefit for dog and cat pheromones, but as is all too common in veterinary research, it has a critical flaw that renders its conclusions unreliable.

Prior MR, Mills DS. Cats vs. Dogs: The Efficacy of Feliway FriendsTM and AdaptilTM Products in Multispecies Homes.Front Vet Sci. 2020;7:399. doi:10.3389/fvets.2020.00399

This study looked at the potential use of both dog and cat commercial pheromone products in reducing undesirable behaviors and promoting desirable ones in households with dogs and cats living together. The authors created a list of such behaviors and a survey instrument for owners to rate their view of the relationship between their dogs and cats. The study then recruited owners, online and through veterinary practices, who felt that there was room for improvement in the relationship between their dogs and cats to test the effects of dog and cat pheromone diffusers.

The owners spent two weeks scoring the behaviors between their dogs and cats. They were then randomly assigned a diffuser emitting either a cat pheromone or a dog pheromone, and they continued scoring these behaviors for an additional four weeks. The owners and investigators didn’t know which type of diffuser each group was using. The results showed a significant increase in desirable behaviors and a significant decrease in undesirable behaviors between the baseline and test period for both pheromones, with no difference between the dog and cat products. 

Seven percent of UK households are estimated to own both a cat and a dog, despite a popular view that the two do not live well together.

Have you spotted the flaw yet? That’s right, there was no placebo control. Both groups got what they believed to be a device to improve their pets’ behaviors, and both groups saw such improvement. This is the perfect design for eliciting a caregiver placebo effect, but it is not a reliable way of testing the efficacy of a behavioral treatment. 

This omission of a routine, standard aspect to any clinical trial is so glaring, it would be hard to imagine the investigators didn’t deliberately choose to omit it. Certainly, the authors were aware that this design could simply be an illustration of a placebo effect, because they address the issue in their discussion:

“There are two obvious possible interpretations of the absence of a significant difference between the treatment groups in these outcomes: either both groups were subject to a similar placebo effect; or both diffuser products were similarly effective.

Unfortunately, their response to this problem is unconvincing. They choose to simply assert, without evidence, that the effect seen was too large to be explained by placebo effects. There was also some suggestion in the data that cats responded more to cat pheromone and dogs more to dog pheromone, which the authors also feel argues against the results being due to placebo effects. However, these post-hoc explanations are just speculation, and it is mystifying that the authors would choose not to include the most basic bias control technique for any clinical study.

Bias, of course, is always an issue in any research study, which is why controls such as placebo groups and blinding are so critical. This study had several potential sources of bias beyond the cognitive biases that could have led to an owner placebo effect. The company selling the products tested had some financial relationship to the study, providing their products for free and paying for the study to be made available as an open-access publication. One of the authors, Dr. Mills, has been a committed advocate of pheromone therapy for many years. While I don’t doubt this is based on his sincere believe in the scientific case for these products, it is well-established that research groups consistently pursuing validation of a particular hypothesis tend to have deep unconscious and conscious biases in favor of that hypothesis. Research from such sources merits careful critical appraisal, particularly when essential bias control tools are not employed.

Bottom Line
This study, unfortunately, does little to clarify the potential value of dog and cat pheromones for behavior problems due to the glaring lack of a placebo group and other potential sources of uncontrolled bias. It is disappointing that despite decades of commercial sale and clinical use of pheromone products, we are still lacking robust, replicated, convincing scientific evidence of their effectiveness. 

While there are likely no direct risks to using such products, I see numerous pet owners and veterinarians turn to them before pursuing appropriate behavioral or pharmacologic therapy for serious behavioral problems. The false impression that these are treatments with solid scientific support does cause indirect harm by delaying or replacing other therapies. Our pets deserve the best treatment possible, and this is always the treatment supported by the strongest evidence. So far, pheromones do not meet this standard.

This entry was posted in Herbs and Supplements. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Evidence Update: The Latest on Pheromones for Behavior Problems in Dogs and Cats

  1. Jen Robinson says:

    I’m fascinated by the vomeronasal organ in a somewhat science fiction way. There’s a world out there that we perceive only dimly because for us the organ is much diminished. Why does my dog roll with delight in some innocuous weed? Why does a tracker dog work well but loose it when the scent leads to a suicide? Biologists gravitate to sexual behaviors and reproduction in looking at pheromones but as an atmospheric scientist, I suspect there’s a much broader arena of aerosol chemistry and environmental perception at play, and that simple signal response models miss a lot.
    Success seems unlikely for products claiming to use this poorly understood 6th sense to manage behavior.

  2. v.t. says:

    At least Ceva finally thought to get an independent study other than their own (but it wasn’t really independent after all), and yeah, no placebo group, what were they thinking!

    I often wonder the percentage of owners who actually try behavioral methods first and for how long (as well as seeking professional behavioral health), before they ‘resort’ to products like this – or if they just consider the ‘easy’ way first (the product, and with preconceived notions it will work).

  3. SitStay says:

    as soon as I put the collar on my cat changed dramatically for the good, she was grooming herself constantly and scratching around her neck area, this was all before I put the collar on. It seemed to stop instantly. After a few months I took it off, she went back to doing the same old thing. Now I just put a new one on, it hasn’t changed her bad habits in the least and she has peed on a rug twice within the last month, so I’m not sure whether to keep it on or not?

  4. skeptvet says:

    It’s not likely to be harmful, but I suspect the initial apparent response wasn’t really an effect of pheromones but due to another cause (maybe changes in your behavior, the natural coming and going of the problem, etc.).

  5. Sarah C says:

    It is so crazy to me to know that research can be so imperfect. I’ve always held all research with such a high regard and listened unquestioningly, I never knew there could even be mistakes! Thank you for sharing your information with us, I’m definitely wiser for it!

  6. Jackie says:

    – urinating on carpet 2x a month with tx collar on (or off I’m assuming)
    – over grooming & itchy around neck area seems to diminish with collar on

    Sounds like hyperesthesia or psychogenic alopecia both of which are usually either allergies related and/or stress related in the ocd compulsive type of stress (vs aggression or fear stress responses). Can also be more neurological via neurotransmitters.

    Should try testing with a similarly sized collar preferably a similar type of material and weight without a bell or annoying clasp or D-ring (avoid metals).

    Any benefit could very well be due to the tx collar either or both 1. Blocking access to the area being compulsively scratched/groomed and or 2. Providing calming effect by being a continuous sensory input on a location that the cat compulsively touches when feeling stressed. Similar to the idea of a Thundervest or holding overwhelmed autistic children when they’re overwhelmed to recalibrate the sensory system to a baseline, just less restrictive via collar on location where animal associates touch with stress relief.

    Just an idea!

  7. Karen Arkin says:

    It’s possible I missed it in your literature, but did you address these two studies? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2839826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7761923/

  8. skeptvet says:

    I can’t recall if I addressed to 2010 study in a previous post or not. I don’t think I’ve looked at the 2020 study yet, so I’ll keep en eye on that for the next post I do on this topic. Thanks!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *